Guidable.
Every feature follows the same path: intent → code → infra → config → verification → rollout. Agents pick up at any station. Humans gate at any point. Nothing skips.
The control plane for multi-agentic engineering — guidable, auditable, ready to ship.
A diff isn't a feature. A feature is code, infra, config, security, observability, and rollout — coordinated. The gap is where teams improvise.
Single-session tools don't compose. Run four agents in parallel and humans become the glue — chasing context across Git, Terraform, LaunchDarkly, Datadog, Slack.
Decisions and evidence scatter across tools and memory. The next agent — or reviewer — starts from zero.
What ships, what's safe, what's verified — all of it lives in Slack threads and heads. Add agents, improvisation scales. Trust doesn't.
96% of developers don't fully trust AI output. 48% verify it. Tests pass; production breaks. "Ready to ship" became a vibe.
A software factory has to do four things. We do them.
Every feature follows the same path: intent → code → infra → config → verification → rollout. Agents pick up at any station. Humans gate at any point. Nothing skips.
Every change carries its provenance: which agent, which approver, which checks, which evidence. The audit trail is the byproduct of the work.
Production-readiness is computed, not vibed. Ships only when every check passes against real evidence — Terraform plan, canary metric, security delta.
One versioned graph holds every feature in flight. Agents read from it. Humans gate against it. More agents = more payoff.
At the core: a versioned graph of every artifact and dependency in flight. Agents read it. Humans gate against it. Verification computes against it.
Agents are the data plane — they write code, propose Terraform, set flags. The control plane sequences, verifies, ships. Same pattern that lets Kubernetes run thousands of pods.
Define what "ready to ship" means: canary windows, security checks, approval rules. Enforced across every change, every agent.
Surfaces through tools you already use — PRs, CI checks, Slack, dashboards. No new tool to live in.
If you're running Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or custom agents in parallel — and feeling the coordination tax.
Platform engineers tired of being the human glue between agents, CI, infra, and reviewers.
Engineering leaders scaling agent adoption without scaling production risk.
Staff+ engineers keeping the system coherent as the team ships faster.
If you're running multiple AI coding agents in production, we'd like to talk.